From my history of photography
Over the years, I've handled a lot of different camera bodies in
various formats. The first camera I used was a 6x6 box camera using
roll film. I've used very technical cameras since then and with the
digital age, I started again. Since 2004, I've been using Four-Thirds
and micro Four-Thirds, both Olympus and Panasonic. I tried Nikon for a
bit, but it was a pain, moreso than during the film era. Fujifilm made my favorite film cameras, along with Olympus and Mamiya.
I've
photographed sports with Four-Thirds and micro Four-Thirds equipment starting with
the Olympus E-1 in 2004. Back then, it was hard to believe that
digital cameras would be good enough. Now, it's difficult to believe
that young people are using film cameras or that Pentax and Rollei have developed new film cameras for sale recently.
Back to the present
I just ordered a Panasonic S5 Mk II with 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 and 50mm f/1.8. The Amazon 5 payments thing got my attention. Getting it the next day was surprising. I guess they didn't want me to have time to think about canceling the order.
It's new for me, but this body has been out long enough to have firmware version 3.1. Panasonic finally admitted that they needed to provide Phase Detection AF, instead of their hit-or-miss Depth from Defocus technology that was introduced on the GH4. I didn't like DFD then, and while it's become better, it will never be good enough.
I was looking at another micro Four-Thirds body, an Olympus E-M1 Mk III, which was good and then, there was a Panasonic G9 Mk II trade-in special that was incredible, marking it down US$600 and then, adding your trade-in value. The G9 Mk II also has PDAF. They did the same with the GH7.
The problem with micro Four-Thirds is that we don't know when it will end. 135 Format is claiming a lot of the market finally, as mirrorless bodies have taken over in a big way. I got involved with micro Four-Thirds back in 2012 with the GH3. At one point, I was taking an Olympus E-M1, Panasonic GH4, GX8, and GM5 to skate parks with me. Now, I only have the GM5.
Panasonic to Panasonic
The S5 Mk II is about the same size as the GH4. It's not huge, but it is bigger than the undersized Sony bodies that are difficult to hold but becoming better. It's certainly bigger than most of the 135 Format film bodies from the 1970s, except for the Nikon F2.
The lenses seem small, but again, they're bigger than equivalent lenses in the 1970s. However, nothing back then was weather-sealed and not much had auto focus. The Polaroid SX70 was the first camera I sold (I was in camera sales for a while) with auto focus, and auto exposure was just coming to cameras later in that decade.
I'm charging the S5 Mk II battery right now. Instead of a separate charger, they have a USB type-A to type-C cable, and a power adapter for AC current. The light atop the body signals that it is being charged. That is also the light that signals a connection to the phone app.
The menus are familiar but much has been added since the GH4 or GX8. It's going to take a while to get the settings right. I need to set up the custom settings, so that it uses Natural, instead of Standard, and Raw instead of JPEG. I also need to set a video mode, 1920x1080 at 60p. While I have computers to handle 3840x2160 or 4096x2160, I don't want to record 4K video. I found that you must set file format MP4 for 1080p, unlike what I did with the GH4. MOV format is reserved for 4K and C4K.
I need to order an SD Card for storage. I have a few around here somewhere, but they're older. This body uses UHS II cards for speed. There are two slots but I don't need to fill both. I'm also considering third party batteries. There is a brand called Wasabi with a charger and two batteries for US$39.99. I can't imagine that they'll last a year, but for my casual use, that shouldn't be a problem. My official Panasonic GH4 batteries were still going after three years.
How much does anyone need?
I've watched a few videos about the S5 Mk II and how it compares to Sony and Canon. Why don't they compare it to Nikon? I'm not sure.
24 Megapixels isn't a lot in 2024, especially with Fujifilm's APS-C sensor having 40 MP. I don't need more and I suspect few people need more, unless they're working professionally. In that case, they should be using Medium Format. Lower pixel counts require you to be more careful. I've been working mostly with 16 MP and occasionally with 20 MP. I'm sure 24 MP will be fine for me, especially with a dual-gain sensor. I was using ISO 3200 as my upper limit of acceptable photos for micro Four-Thirds, ISO 4000 for the Nikon D7200, and I expect ISO 6400 will be the reasonable limit for this sensor, but I might push it to ISO 12800.
Thinking about APS-C, there is such a mode, similar to what Nikon does from FX to DX. It likely works with L-mount lenses that are connected electronically, rather than with manual lenses. I was thinking about one of the fisheye lenses that are available. They're mostly the same as the micro Four-Thirds lenses but with a different mount, meaning that there are no electronics. I suspect that an older, electronically-connected lens from Sigma or Canon with an adapter would be preferable. Having had the Olympus 8mm f/1.8 fisheye lens makes any other lens less appealing.
I keep thinking about the day in April 2004 when I bought the Olympus E-1, 50-200mm f/2.8-3.5, and 14-54mm f/2.8-3.5. I spent about US$3000 and this S5 Mk II kit cost about US$2249. I didn't get a telephoto zoom of any kind with the S5 Mk II, unfortunately. That would have cost at least an extra US$1000 right now for a Panasonic lens. Having two lenses that overlap isn't great, but night shooting is possible.
I'm thinking about a Samyang 35-150mm f/2.0-2.8 as a zoom lens to cover a decent range at a big aperture. There really aren't many telephoto lenses although Sigma's 60-600mm lens (like Bigma, 50-500mm), covers quite a bit, if you have a strong heart and a strong tripod. The reviews say that there is a problem with the Samyang lens, but you can update the firmware. Apparently, the lens firmware is updated the way we used to do with the micro Four-Thirds lenses on Panasonic bodies by putting the update on the SD Card. If the firmware corrects the problem, US$1399 is a decent price for a good, maybe great, lens.
Update 2024.10.20: Yesterday, I took the S5 Mk II out for a few night photos. I regularly did the same with the GH4 years ago, so I hoped for good results. However, I might not have had things set properly. Having a camera for about a week and going for the first try, I might still not have been ready. Besides, I'm not as steady as I used to be.
This one was taken with Auto ISO. Later photos were taken with ISO 4000 to ensure that it activated the higher ISO gain but this one looks just fine. I could see a long spider web thread.
What made the GH4 so impressive is that it could focus in "starlight" EV -4. The GH3 had that enhancement added via a firmware update.
I had taken out the GM5 earlier in the afternoon and I wonder if I did better with it. After eight years, the AF is generally tried and true.
Update 2024.10.24: I went out tonight with the 20-60mm f/3.5-5.6 which seemed like a bad idea. It wasn't perceptibly worse than going out with the 50mm f/1.8 lens. Most of the shots had a shutter speed of 1.3 seconds. I even managed to hold most of them steady. One thing that seems a bit odd to me is that the 20-60mm doesn't have any OIS (optical image stabilization), whereas the micro Four-Thirds standard kit lenses (14-45mm, 14-42mm) did. I'm trying to think back to the Four-Thirds Leica/Lumix D lenses and I believe that the standard zoom lenses also had OIS. The Leica-designed normal 25mm f/1.4 did not.
Thankfully, the IBIS is as effective as that of Olympus. They started out on the same sized sensor but the 36x24mm vs 17.3x13mm makes for some addition stress. Getting 96 MP out of high resolution mode is impressive. Panasonic did a lot of work to make that happen.
Update 2024.11.18: I'm still adjusting. I bought a tripod. It's a Smallrig CT-20, which can be converted into a monopod. The instructions aren't good, so I'm figuring it out. It was quite a bit less expensive that my Manfrotto tripod, which was a bit over US$200 back in 2012. US$80 in 2024 doesn't seem much, especially coming from a company that designs and builds cages for cameras in the video industry. Supposedly, it can support about 33 pounds/15 kg but I saw a lower figure for the ball head. In any case, the S5 Mk II and most lenses will not add up to anywhere near that heavy. Even that Samyang 35-150mm f/2.0-2.8.
I actually wanted to get some shots of the supermoon but the tripod didn't arrive in time and my Panasonic GM5 and Olympus 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 doesn't have OIS. Having a proper telephoto zoom for the S5 Mk II might be a while, especially as slowly as Panasonic is designing and producing them.
Update 2025.07.08: I have three native Panasonic lenses now. The 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 is good. I've been able to photograph the moon and the Dual I.S. works well. I'd never used that on micro Four-Thirds since my GH4 was too early and I'd only used the Sync I.S. on my Olympus E-M1 once, with the 12-100mm f/4.0. It's a lot of stabilization, no matter the system.
Since I have the 70-300mm, the effective reach is about the same as the 40-150mm on micro Four-Thirds.
Panasonic has introduced the S1 Mk II, S1R Mk II, and the S1E, which is more like an upgraded S5 Mk II or IIx. The S1H Mk II may be introduced soon.
I've been watching videos for any information regarding the sluggish low light auto focus. Enabling the Fast AF functionality has helped. It's unusual that such has to be done.
