Since the iPhone 5c, I've settled on one brand of case: Ballistic.
Sure, I tried Otterbox and it saved me headaches, but as the size of phones has increased, Ballistic's hard and soft surfaces seem to fit my pocket better and their crash testing seems correct.
How much is a case worth on a US$749 phone? You only have to look at a few drops and the repairs to see that US$34.99 isn't much to prevent repairs over the life of a phone.
This time, I bought two Tough Jacket cases, one white and black, and the other black. At the time, they were on discount at US$19.99 each. Now, they're US$34.99 each. Signing up for their newsletter will notify you of discounts.
Apparently, you can use these for the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6s, as well, but you can't use the earlier phone cases, as it partly covers the camera lens.
I don't get anything for doing this but here is the link: https://www.goballisticcase.com/
Ramblings on computers, cameras, cars, and other things that start with C.
Showing posts with label Ballistic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ballistic. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Wednesday, December 17, 2014
iPhone 6 cases and screen protectors
Oh, the trouble with switching phones can be huge. At least, this time I didn't have to get new accessories because I changed cables and connectors.
(tl;dr : I bought a Ballistic Tungsten Tough case and Otterbox Glass screen protector)
My iPhone 5c was about one year old and I switched from an iPhone 4s then, also switching from the 30 pin connector to the Lightning connector. When I got the iPhone 5c, I bought another Otterbox Defender case at the same time as I bought the phone.
It was poorly designed, apparently to be first to market. People were cutting out the screen protector because it was too far away from the screen it was supposed to protect. I swore I'd never buy another case from Otterbox.
I'd seen a load of Ballistic brand cases in another store near the Sprint store, and I was close to buying something else. A couple of months later, I ordered an SG MAXX case from the company directly, as the local store was almost out of them. It was just as good as that other brand, but it was easy to take off and put on the phone. Something that was practically impossible with the Defender case.
Okay, so, here I was buying an iPhone 6 with no Ballistic case in hand and I couldn't find a store ahead of time that carried them. I ended up with a Griffin case than claimed 3 feet for drop protection, and an Otterbox screen protector made of glass.
The screen protector was of great significance since that was a huge problem with the iPhone 5c cases. As I wrote earlier, many people cut out the Defender screen protector because of the gap between it and the screen. Ballistic had an add-in screen protector that made it difficult to see the screen. A corner of the protector would slip out on occasion. I ended up with an Invisible Shield protector, as it seemed an early and popular choice.
After that year, the Invisible Shield protector had become rather nasty. The instructions recommended installing it again from time to time, I guess so that you could clean the phone's display. Even when new, it seemed a bit wrinkled, and that seemed normal. Even car tint carefully installed can look like this because of the various layers.
The glass screen protector is practically perfect. There is some adhesive keeping it tightly attached, and it feels as though I'm directly touching the device.
While I could appreciate the Griffin case for its minimalistic design, I prefer not to break my phone if I drop it. No phone is attractive when it's in more than one piece. I also don't care to advertise the Apple logo out the back of the case. Why invite trouble?
So, I was in a Best Buy a few days later during the Christmas rush and found three Ballistic cases that were not on the company's website. I'm guessing that these are higher profit, lower cost cases made specifically for Best buy. I'm cynical, but is that wrong?
$34.99, $39.99, or $49.99? I wasn't sure what to trust. I still wasn't sure if they were fakes. I chose the $39.99 Tungsten Tough case, labeled 7+ feet drop tested. It's not as thin as the $34.99 case, but I had been using a case with a holster previously. I'm thinking that I still want that extra protection, although it's a pain to get the phone open quickly to answer a call.
How much is $849.99 worth to you? If you don't have enough protection and need to have the device fixed or replaced, what if that cost exceeds $49.99? Is a pretty case worth the extra cost of repairs?
Update 2015.04.03: The Ballistic brand case has been as good as the previous case for the iPhone 5c. I've dropped the iPhone 6 a few times and the case has kept the phone safe, and even the case seems to be fine. In fact, it is incredibly difficult to separate the phone and case. That's almost a good thing, although there was dirt inside of the case. It's surprising how good the iPhone 6 feels by itself but I'd hate to see it smashed on the floor.
It was a while later that Ballistic's web site showed the Tungsten-branded models that are apparently only available at Best Buy. That gave me a better feeling about spending US$39.99, because I'm not always trusting of Best Buy.
I still miss the holster clip, so I may buy one of those. I've noticed a problem with the phone further down in my pocket--lint. It's having more trouble with charging than usual. Some cables aren't working 100% of the time. The car charger sometimes stops charging during a trip, so I find that the phone is at 50% or less. I guess that's the problem of not having a case with a flap over the Lightning port.
(tl;dr : I bought a Ballistic Tungsten Tough case and Otterbox Glass screen protector)
My iPhone 5c was about one year old and I switched from an iPhone 4s then, also switching from the 30 pin connector to the Lightning connector. When I got the iPhone 5c, I bought another Otterbox Defender case at the same time as I bought the phone.
It was poorly designed, apparently to be first to market. People were cutting out the screen protector because it was too far away from the screen it was supposed to protect. I swore I'd never buy another case from Otterbox.
I'd seen a load of Ballistic brand cases in another store near the Sprint store, and I was close to buying something else. A couple of months later, I ordered an SG MAXX case from the company directly, as the local store was almost out of them. It was just as good as that other brand, but it was easy to take off and put on the phone. Something that was practically impossible with the Defender case.
Okay, so, here I was buying an iPhone 6 with no Ballistic case in hand and I couldn't find a store ahead of time that carried them. I ended up with a Griffin case than claimed 3 feet for drop protection, and an Otterbox screen protector made of glass.
The screen protector was of great significance since that was a huge problem with the iPhone 5c cases. As I wrote earlier, many people cut out the Defender screen protector because of the gap between it and the screen. Ballistic had an add-in screen protector that made it difficult to see the screen. A corner of the protector would slip out on occasion. I ended up with an Invisible Shield protector, as it seemed an early and popular choice.
After that year, the Invisible Shield protector had become rather nasty. The instructions recommended installing it again from time to time, I guess so that you could clean the phone's display. Even when new, it seemed a bit wrinkled, and that seemed normal. Even car tint carefully installed can look like this because of the various layers.
The glass screen protector is practically perfect. There is some adhesive keeping it tightly attached, and it feels as though I'm directly touching the device.
While I could appreciate the Griffin case for its minimalistic design, I prefer not to break my phone if I drop it. No phone is attractive when it's in more than one piece. I also don't care to advertise the Apple logo out the back of the case. Why invite trouble?
So, I was in a Best Buy a few days later during the Christmas rush and found three Ballistic cases that were not on the company's website. I'm guessing that these are higher profit, lower cost cases made specifically for Best buy. I'm cynical, but is that wrong?
$34.99, $39.99, or $49.99? I wasn't sure what to trust. I still wasn't sure if they were fakes. I chose the $39.99 Tungsten Tough case, labeled 7+ feet drop tested. It's not as thin as the $34.99 case, but I had been using a case with a holster previously. I'm thinking that I still want that extra protection, although it's a pain to get the phone open quickly to answer a call.
How much is $849.99 worth to you? If you don't have enough protection and need to have the device fixed or replaced, what if that cost exceeds $49.99? Is a pretty case worth the extra cost of repairs?
Update 2015.04.03: The Ballistic brand case has been as good as the previous case for the iPhone 5c. I've dropped the iPhone 6 a few times and the case has kept the phone safe, and even the case seems to be fine. In fact, it is incredibly difficult to separate the phone and case. That's almost a good thing, although there was dirt inside of the case. It's surprising how good the iPhone 6 feels by itself but I'd hate to see it smashed on the floor.
It was a while later that Ballistic's web site showed the Tungsten-branded models that are apparently only available at Best Buy. That gave me a better feeling about spending US$39.99, because I'm not always trusting of Best Buy.
I still miss the holster clip, so I may buy one of those. I've noticed a problem with the phone further down in my pocket--lint. It's having more trouble with charging than usual. Some cables aren't working 100% of the time. The car charger sometimes stops charging during a trip, so I find that the phone is at 50% or less. I guess that's the problem of not having a case with a flap over the Lightning port.
Sunday, December 7, 2014
Got an iPhone 6 last night and stayed with Sprint
As you might have read already, I live in an area where the LTE installations haven't been finished. While much of the town is on LTE, I live on the edge of LTE and a roaming zone. In fact, my bedroom seems to be a transition area between 3G/EVDO and LTE, so I end up with 1xRTT too many times for too long.
I went to see Verizon, but after seeing the local reseller's Yelp ratings, I went to a city 15 miles away where there was an official company store.
They currently have a $150 switching rebate, and I had found that the data sharing plan of 12 GB had been upgraded to 15 GB. This is important as I already have a mobile hotspot with the company. Service is better than Sprint but not great, as though it's bordering on overloaded. We apparently don't have enough towers in town.
I waited about 15 minutes until there was an available associate. We talked, and he explained the rent-to-buy plan. It sounded fine, and then, he talked about the data plan--6 GB for $120, along with talk and text messaging, which we didn't even discuss. I told him that I'd really have to think about that, since it would drive my total expense up by $40.
Then, I said "I thought there was a 12GB 15 GB sharing plan" and he seemed to tap his headset, and looked surprised "Oh, why didn't I think of that?" and as if he'd been given information by someone behind the curtain, he remarked "That would be $160." That pretty much ended the conversation but I asked if he was on commission, and he said yes, and had someone get his card for me. I figured that he would get a little extra each month by not suggesting the cheaper plan.
I went to one of the two Sprint kiosks in the mall just after that. The first was busy, so I went to the other. I said "Give me a reason to stay with Sprint. I'm ready to pay my ETF." and we started a discussion.
Within only a couple of minutes, he mentioned an extra discount for long time customers on the lease plan. This also supposedly doesn't include a contract. They get to keep the phone at the end of the lease or you can pay an extra $200 to keep it. I was a bit confused, but it still sounded okay. Except for prepaid service, is it ever 100% straightforward? Since I wanted a 64GB iPhone 6, it cost a bit more.
Naturally, with these plans, you leave without paying anything. They put certain things on your initial bill, like the !@#$ $36.00 activation fee--yes, they need to pay for the rigamarole to handle all the crap of paperwork.
My plan is a bit old, so they had trouble deciding which reason to use to make the lease work. They need to add "Hella Old Plan" to the list. Eventually, everything was fine, and they also sold me a Otterbox glass screen protector and a Griffin case. Amusingly, my old address from 2000-2008 was there, and now, with one of the receipts sent by e-mail, they showed me Indiana taxes, where I haven't lived for months.
What's bad about the lease discount is that I had to stay with my current service plan. They have a better, cheaper plan now. Actually, last year when I got the iPhone 5c, they add an Unlimited Everything plan or some such that was the same price but had no limits. Still, I don't talk on the phone enough to need my current minutes.
Oh, and I didn't have to pay the ETF, so far. Hopefully, it won't show up, since I was told that it wouldn't happen.
They asked me if I wanted insurance, and I told them AppleCare+ but I'm not sure that it will arrive or not. They didn't charge me for it, but then, they didn't charge me right away last year. I didn't want Asurion to handle it, as they want lots of money each month, and they have no problem refusing service.
In any case, the iPhone 6 is much better than the iPhone 5c. That's a surprise? I suppose not. I'm thankful that the iPhone 6 is a bit more efficient than the iPhone 5s. I was concerned about buying a first-generation 64-bit processor from Apple, so I didn't buy the iPhone 5s. The phone keeps up with me, except when service is poor. Given that the iPhone 5c is a two band LTE device and the iPhone 6 is a three band LTE device, I should have great performance in certain areas where the Nextel 800 MHz frequency band has been re-purposed.
Most apps I use seem to have been updated for iPhone 6, as well as iOS 8.x and they seem fine. However, there seem to be so many bug fixes, with apps being updated every few days. Asphalt 8 takes advantage of the new abilities and has some extra special effects. I'm not seeing anything else like that from other apps, but everything else seems smooth.
As it has only been a little over 24 hours, I don't know how the battery life really is. I was in a habit of charging whenever possible--in the car, in the house, and I have a Sony charging kit with a 10,000 mAh battery. I'm not comfortable enough to let it go overnight without a charge, though I suspect that it will be fine.
The display seems so good. I wish that they'd picked a more standard size, such as 1280x800 but had 1334-by-750-pixel resolution at 326 ppi. That's big enough to play 720p video, finally. Seeing "Full sRGB standard" makes me happy. I can't tell you how many times I've looked at photos I've taken and the color range and dynamic range is lower than expected, leaving my photos not looking their best, requiring imagination.
TouchID seems to work well. I was carrying on a conversation with the salesperson while trying to set up the phone and I wasn't synchronizing my movements well, but the TouchID setup was very patient. It works fine and it's good to be able to put my thumb on the Home button to unlock the phone. I'm not ready to use Apple Pay. Let someone else live through the problems.
The thing I don't like is the size of the phone. It's not horribly big, but it is a big difference. When I'm playing games in a landscape position, it's great. When I'm trying to use it as an internet device in portrait orientation, it's a little uncomfortable to use with one hand.
What else? I'm planning to buy another Ballistic case, so I don't have to worry about dropping it. The current Griffin case was labeled with "3'" but does it actually work after a drop of three feet? The glass screen protector from Otterbox seems fine, but for such a price, it should be fine.
Oh, the speakers are in the way of my hands. Yes, I know that doesn't make sense. Playing games or watching videos in landscape orientation, I can barely hear the sound at all. If they'd be a little less obsessed with thin and light, they'd likely have made it so headphones aren't necessary. Maybe, I can charge my Bluetooth-connected Motorola S9 headphones and hopefully, the synchronization of sound is better than way back when with the second generation iPod touch and iOS 5.x.
Update 2014.12.12: I found Best Buy-only Ballistic cases for iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus. They were $34.99, $39.99, and $49.99. I bought one of the $39.99 priced cases that was labeled Tungsten Tough. You won't find these on the Ballistic web site. It's a similar situation to the Klipsch speakers that are made for Best Buy. I suspect that there is a higher profit margin. The case has what seems to be anodized aluminum in back. The drop rating was 7+ feet. The case for $49.99 added water resistance, a screen protector, and an 8+ rating for drops.
I'm not sure if I'll miss the clip (it didn't turn the case into a viewing easel), as it has hung on to my pocket when I didn't quite have the case far enough into the pocket, but the company's protection is great, so a 7+ rating should handle a fall from my pocket easily.
Update 2015.02.10: I have to say that the situation with Sprint in California isn't as good as it should be. I understand that it is a long state, but seeing "No Service" should never happen, and it happened too often on my trip from Northern California to San Diego.
The compensation is that when LTE was available, it worked very well. I've found too many transition zones, just like in my apartment, where they still haven't got overlapping towers.
Update 2015.11.06: Sprint provided better technology and therefore, a better connection. After 1 month, they took it away, and things are back to the way they had been. Where they have good service, the phone works just fine. Elsewhere, the service is poor and the phone works poorly. I was told I needed to have the phone serviced. I told the @sprintcare team that I didn't know that humor was a new service they offered.
I almost wish that I had not got the new phone so I could switch to T-Mobile, which has improved their service. Even paying more to Verizon might have been worth it. I've been with Sprint since 2000 and the last couple of months have made me wish that Sprint would go out of business. I actually mentioned that to the @sprintsavings people on Twitter.
The phone has been good. Now, with iOS 9.0.2, it seems even better, if still a bit buggy.
Verizon First
I went to see Verizon, but after seeing the local reseller's Yelp ratings, I went to a city 15 miles away where there was an official company store.
They currently have a $150 switching rebate, and I had found that the data sharing plan of 12 GB had been upgraded to 15 GB. This is important as I already have a mobile hotspot with the company. Service is better than Sprint but not great, as though it's bordering on overloaded. We apparently don't have enough towers in town.
I waited about 15 minutes until there was an available associate. We talked, and he explained the rent-to-buy plan. It sounded fine, and then, he talked about the data plan--6 GB for $120, along with talk and text messaging, which we didn't even discuss. I told him that I'd really have to think about that, since it would drive my total expense up by $40.
Then, I said "I thought there was a 12GB 15 GB sharing plan" and he seemed to tap his headset, and looked surprised "Oh, why didn't I think of that?" and as if he'd been given information by someone behind the curtain, he remarked "That would be $160." That pretty much ended the conversation but I asked if he was on commission, and he said yes, and had someone get his card for me. I figured that he would get a little extra each month by not suggesting the cheaper plan.
Sprint Next but not Nextel
I went to one of the two Sprint kiosks in the mall just after that. The first was busy, so I went to the other. I said "Give me a reason to stay with Sprint. I'm ready to pay my ETF." and we started a discussion.
Within only a couple of minutes, he mentioned an extra discount for long time customers on the lease plan. This also supposedly doesn't include a contract. They get to keep the phone at the end of the lease or you can pay an extra $200 to keep it. I was a bit confused, but it still sounded okay. Except for prepaid service, is it ever 100% straightforward? Since I wanted a 64GB iPhone 6, it cost a bit more.
Naturally, with these plans, you leave without paying anything. They put certain things on your initial bill, like the !@#$ $36.00 activation fee--yes, they need to pay for the rigamarole to handle all the crap of paperwork.
My plan is a bit old, so they had trouble deciding which reason to use to make the lease work. They need to add "Hella Old Plan" to the list. Eventually, everything was fine, and they also sold me a Otterbox glass screen protector and a Griffin case. Amusingly, my old address from 2000-2008 was there, and now, with one of the receipts sent by e-mail, they showed me Indiana taxes, where I haven't lived for months.
What's bad about the lease discount is that I had to stay with my current service plan. They have a better, cheaper plan now. Actually, last year when I got the iPhone 5c, they add an Unlimited Everything plan or some such that was the same price but had no limits. Still, I don't talk on the phone enough to need my current minutes.
Oh, and I didn't have to pay the ETF, so far. Hopefully, it won't show up, since I was told that it wouldn't happen.
They asked me if I wanted insurance, and I told them AppleCare+ but I'm not sure that it will arrive or not. They didn't charge me for it, but then, they didn't charge me right away last year. I didn't want Asurion to handle it, as they want lots of money each month, and they have no problem refusing service.
In any case, the iPhone 6 is much better than the iPhone 5c. That's a surprise? I suppose not. I'm thankful that the iPhone 6 is a bit more efficient than the iPhone 5s. I was concerned about buying a first-generation 64-bit processor from Apple, so I didn't buy the iPhone 5s. The phone keeps up with me, except when service is poor. Given that the iPhone 5c is a two band LTE device and the iPhone 6 is a three band LTE device, I should have great performance in certain areas where the Nextel 800 MHz frequency band has been re-purposed.
Most apps I use seem to have been updated for iPhone 6, as well as iOS 8.x and they seem fine. However, there seem to be so many bug fixes, with apps being updated every few days. Asphalt 8 takes advantage of the new abilities and has some extra special effects. I'm not seeing anything else like that from other apps, but everything else seems smooth.
As it has only been a little over 24 hours, I don't know how the battery life really is. I was in a habit of charging whenever possible--in the car, in the house, and I have a Sony charging kit with a 10,000 mAh battery. I'm not comfortable enough to let it go overnight without a charge, though I suspect that it will be fine.
The display seems so good. I wish that they'd picked a more standard size, such as 1280x800 but had 1334-by-750-pixel resolution at 326 ppi. That's big enough to play 720p video, finally. Seeing "Full sRGB standard" makes me happy. I can't tell you how many times I've looked at photos I've taken and the color range and dynamic range is lower than expected, leaving my photos not looking their best, requiring imagination.
TouchID seems to work well. I was carrying on a conversation with the salesperson while trying to set up the phone and I wasn't synchronizing my movements well, but the TouchID setup was very patient. It works fine and it's good to be able to put my thumb on the Home button to unlock the phone. I'm not ready to use Apple Pay. Let someone else live through the problems.
The thing I don't like is the size of the phone. It's not horribly big, but it is a big difference. When I'm playing games in a landscape position, it's great. When I'm trying to use it as an internet device in portrait orientation, it's a little uncomfortable to use with one hand.
What else? I'm planning to buy another Ballistic case, so I don't have to worry about dropping it. The current Griffin case was labeled with "3'" but does it actually work after a drop of three feet? The glass screen protector from Otterbox seems fine, but for such a price, it should be fine.
Oh, the speakers are in the way of my hands. Yes, I know that doesn't make sense. Playing games or watching videos in landscape orientation, I can barely hear the sound at all. If they'd be a little less obsessed with thin and light, they'd likely have made it so headphones aren't necessary. Maybe, I can charge my Bluetooth-connected Motorola S9 headphones and hopefully, the synchronization of sound is better than way back when with the second generation iPod touch and iOS 5.x.
Update 2014.12.12: I found Best Buy-only Ballistic cases for iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus. They were $34.99, $39.99, and $49.99. I bought one of the $39.99 priced cases that was labeled Tungsten Tough. You won't find these on the Ballistic web site. It's a similar situation to the Klipsch speakers that are made for Best Buy. I suspect that there is a higher profit margin. The case has what seems to be anodized aluminum in back. The drop rating was 7+ feet. The case for $49.99 added water resistance, a screen protector, and an 8+ rating for drops.
I'm not sure if I'll miss the clip (it didn't turn the case into a viewing easel), as it has hung on to my pocket when I didn't quite have the case far enough into the pocket, but the company's protection is great, so a 7+ rating should handle a fall from my pocket easily.
Update 2015.02.10: I have to say that the situation with Sprint in California isn't as good as it should be. I understand that it is a long state, but seeing "No Service" should never happen, and it happened too often on my trip from Northern California to San Diego.
The compensation is that when LTE was available, it worked very well. I've found too many transition zones, just like in my apartment, where they still haven't got overlapping towers.
Update 2015.11.06: Sprint provided better technology and therefore, a better connection. After 1 month, they took it away, and things are back to the way they had been. Where they have good service, the phone works just fine. Elsewhere, the service is poor and the phone works poorly. I was told I needed to have the phone serviced. I told the @sprintcare team that I didn't know that humor was a new service they offered.
I almost wish that I had not got the new phone so I could switch to T-Mobile, which has improved their service. Even paying more to Verizon might have been worth it. I've been with Sprint since 2000 and the last couple of months have made me wish that Sprint would go out of business. I actually mentioned that to the @sprintsavings people on Twitter.
The phone has been good. Now, with iOS 9.0.2, it seems even better, if still a bit buggy.
Saturday, December 14, 2013
iPhone 5c cases: Otterbox Defender vs Ballistic SG MAXX
Bottom line: I'm using a Ballistic SG MAXX with an Invisible Shield screen protector.
Since I got my iPhone 5c, it's been inside an Otterbox Defender case. I didn't even have a chance to handle it at the store. This is much the same situation I had with my iPhone 4s, until such time as I needed to wash the case.
The big difference between the two Otterbox Defender cases was the fit. Where the iPhone 4s case was sloppy, the 5c case was taut, and vice versa. There was one huge problem: the fit of the screen protector. It didn't fit against the surface of the display, so that there were two presses--one press against the screen protector and another as the screen protector contacted the display. It made for poor touch screen performance because you wouldn't actually end up pressing precisely where you intended.
There seem to be hundreds of reviews on Amazon.com about the screen protector, and I was told by the salesperson at the Sprint store that three of his customers simply cut away the screen protector. However, on a US$49.99 product that should have been designed correctly, I wasn't about to damage it intentionally. There is something about being first to market with your product, but if being first brings you hate mail because of an incorrect design, why not wait?
So, I bought a Ballstic SG MAXX (apparently renamed to Tough Jacket Maxx) for my iPhone 5c. Apparently, the Hard Core case is not available for this device. Amidst the Christmas buying and shipping season, I waited a few days for this case to arrive from the Miami, Florida area, normally an 24 hour drive for me.
It arrived in a fairly big box with only the case in a Ziploc-type bag with the paperwork inside it. There was no packing. There were no instructions but there was a "Ballistic" sticker that I could use along with my Apple stickers.
Getting the phone out of the Defender case was the big deal. I suspect no one at Otterbox considered that one would remove it, ever. Taking away the rubbery silicone layer isn't difficult. Being careful avoids damage, of course. Removing the hard shell is the painful part. As with the 4s case, looking from the back, you release the clips on the left and right sides. Replacing the 4s case clip on top is a !@#$ tiny piece of plastic which acts as a retainer on the 5c case. It's impossible to grasp, and I couldn't seem to make it collapse by pressing on it. Somehow, with a little force, I managed to release it. At that point, you tilt the back and remove it (as with the 4s case), and remove the phone from the front piece.
The SG MAXX case was quite different. The rubbery silicone fits on the phone first, along with the somewhat rigid screen protector, which is a separate, loose piece. You then add the hard shell, and work with the silicone piece to make sure everything is covered properly. It can be placed in the holster at this point. There was an included graphic on the interior of the holster depicting another product, but reminding you to face the display inward to avoid damage.
It works quite well, although the screen protector gives a sparkly, matte look to the display. However, as a thin sheet, it can be removed easily and something else, such as Invisible Shield can be put in place instead. Having been out into the world to use the phone and case, I've noticed something odd. It doesn't want to stay in the holster all that securely. Maybe, it's something I've done and it's wider than it should be. I'll keep working on it. Update 2013.12.29: That didn't take long to annoy. The fit of the screen protector is not quite right, and changes the more you mess with the case. I finally removed it and bought an Invisible Shield protector for another US$14.95, which means that I've spent over US$100 on two cases and one screen protector. Grrrrr.
For those trying to impress people with your Apple-ness, the logo on the back is not visible with the Ballistic SG MAXX case. With the Defender case, it wasn't centered properly, but it was visible. My take is that it's better not to show it. If people think that they can steal something to sell it later, they will try. Besides, it's just a phone, and it's not worth your life.
I'm not quite sure whether I'm going to try to return the Otterbox Defender to the point of sale or request an RMA to send it to them for a warranty exchange. They really need to know what's wrong with it, although I suspect that they know quite well, and have re-designed the case after getting an iPhone 5c.
Update 2014.06.12: This morning, the little flap over the Lightning connecter port broke. I guess it shouldn't be totally unexpected. I have to move it out of the way frequently, and the phone goes into the holster and that goes into the pocket a lot. Will I notice a difference in protection? Probably, I won't. The rest of the case, both hard and soft parts seem to be okay.
Update 2014.08.24: A month or so ago, I was in a mall and someone selling cases was pushy and told me that Otterbox had glass as their latest screen protector. Recently, Invisible Shield also has a glass version. Certainly, it would be helpful for maximum display clarity. My Ballistic SG MAXX case continues to be fine, even after dropping it a few more times.
Update 2014.12.13: I've switched to the iPhone 6, and I refused to buy another Otterbox Defender, since it was so difficult to remove. All the Sprint kiosk had otherwise, was a Griffin case that said it had been tested to 3 feet. About a week later, I found some Best Buy-only Ballistic brand cases at, you guessed it, Best Buy. I bought the Tungsten Tough for $39.99. It mostly seems like the SG MAXX/Tough Jacket Maxx without the holster clip, but it has an aluminum plate on the back, as though it is hiding that it is a Ballistic product.
Update 2016.11.16: I've got an iPhone 7 and a pair of Ballistic cases of it. Read more here.
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Why is the United States Postal Service so messed up?
I ordered a new Ballstic SG MAXX case for my iPhone 5c. I'm still finding the Otterbox Defender case with its sizable gap between the display and the screen protector to be a problem.
The "Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility" was the first item to show up. Just today, the other two were added, even though the Electronic Shipping Info Received" should have been the first thing, and the "Accepted at USPS Origin Sort Facility" would have happened before the "Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility" activity.
It seems that the government are using the haphazard method that UPS uses. FedEx never seems to have any problem, and packages can even arrive early without extra cost.
Considering that they already had the package last night, shouldn't it already be en route to me, rather than likely sitting in the facility still? Maybe, it is, and they just haven't updated its activities.
I wonder how much damage is involved with USPS, UPS, and FedEx. I know that UPS hires many part-time workers and I've heard stories of flinging boxes when people are bored. I've heard plenty about USPS workers who are too busy to be bothered by work. Is it only the people behind FedEx who care? I've never had a problem with them--the extra money always seems worth it.
Shipping during the holidays is crazy, because so many people are doing it. I'm sure the local post office is crowded during their open hours. Gift cards may be the majority of the gifts, but even those are usually sent.
As of the 13th, things started to change again, though there never was a departure activity from Florida.
It seems odd to me that they delivered the package on the 14th, even though it was just a day later than expected. I've never seen them wait so late to put a package on the route to be delivered. Usually, it should be on the route before 6:30, but perhaps, the logged activity was done separately from the physical activity. However, being that it was Saturday and the holidays, maybe they have a more lenient schedule, especially with the bad weather lately.
By the way, isn't it odd that England's Royal Mail delivers the post and the United States Postal Service delivers the mail?
Also, beware of companies "helping" you to submit a change of address. It's free, and some will show up in a web search ahead of the USPS, and they charge.
Update 2013.12.16: Saw the USPS TV advertisement with "up to 11 scans" and thought "in which order?" after having this experience. They may be more modern, but they still have too many Sand Crabs.
Update 2013.12.18: Amazing that UPS, usually problematic for me, can move when necessary. I have a package from Amazon.com with 3-5 day shipping, arriving the next day.
Of course, had this not been the holiday season, it would have been sitting in one of their depots for 4 days, until they felt like delivering it.
Update 2013.12.29: I guess UPS really messed up. So many packages scheduled to arrive before Christmas day just didn't make it. When I was watching the news video, I was somewhat shocked that UPS had zero problem with letting their workers damage packages while they were being filmed. It just didn't seem that anyone cared, which is probably UPS' biggest problem.
Update 2016.05.01: I've got to say that I'm sadly amused again. I ordered a couple of items on Sunday and they were said to be shipped late Monday. Naturally, it takes a while for the information to be available to the receiver of the package.
On Wednesday, I left a message for the seller that the USPS did not acknowledge the tracking number at all. On Thursday, the seller's status showed "Completed" rather than "Shipped" and I thought that there was a mix up. Friday morning, there was a knock at the door and the packaged had been delivered.
When I checked, the tracking information was available, but apparently, it was all done when the package arrived at the local post office. No scans had been done prior to its arrival.
The "Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility" was the first item to show up. Just today, the other two were added, even though the Electronic Shipping Info Received" should have been the first thing, and the "Accepted at USPS Origin Sort Facility" would have happened before the "Processed at USPS Origin Sort Facility" activity.
It seems that the government are using the haphazard method that UPS uses. FedEx never seems to have any problem, and packages can even arrive early without extra cost.
Considering that they already had the package last night, shouldn't it already be en route to me, rather than likely sitting in the facility still? Maybe, it is, and they just haven't updated its activities.
I wonder how much damage is involved with USPS, UPS, and FedEx. I know that UPS hires many part-time workers and I've heard stories of flinging boxes when people are bored. I've heard plenty about USPS workers who are too busy to be bothered by work. Is it only the people behind FedEx who care? I've never had a problem with them--the extra money always seems worth it.
Shipping during the holidays is crazy, because so many people are doing it. I'm sure the local post office is crowded during their open hours. Gift cards may be the majority of the gifts, but even those are usually sent.
As of the 13th, things started to change again, though there never was a departure activity from Florida.
It seems odd to me that they delivered the package on the 14th, even though it was just a day later than expected. I've never seen them wait so late to put a package on the route to be delivered. Usually, it should be on the route before 6:30, but perhaps, the logged activity was done separately from the physical activity. However, being that it was Saturday and the holidays, maybe they have a more lenient schedule, especially with the bad weather lately.
By the way, isn't it odd that England's Royal Mail delivers the post and the United States Postal Service delivers the mail?
Also, beware of companies "helping" you to submit a change of address. It's free, and some will show up in a web search ahead of the USPS, and they charge.
Update 2013.12.16: Saw the USPS TV advertisement with "up to 11 scans" and thought "in which order?" after having this experience. They may be more modern, but they still have too many Sand Crabs.
Update 2013.12.18: Amazing that UPS, usually problematic for me, can move when necessary. I have a package from Amazon.com with 3-5 day shipping, arriving the next day.
Of course, had this not been the holiday season, it would have been sitting in one of their depots for 4 days, until they felt like delivering it.
Update 2013.12.29: I guess UPS really messed up. So many packages scheduled to arrive before Christmas day just didn't make it. When I was watching the news video, I was somewhat shocked that UPS had zero problem with letting their workers damage packages while they were being filmed. It just didn't seem that anyone cared, which is probably UPS' biggest problem.
Update 2016.05.01: I've got to say that I'm sadly amused again. I ordered a couple of items on Sunday and they were said to be shipped late Monday. Naturally, it takes a while for the information to be available to the receiver of the package.
On Wednesday, I left a message for the seller that the USPS did not acknowledge the tracking number at all. On Thursday, the seller's status showed "Completed" rather than "Shipped" and I thought that there was a mix up. Friday morning, there was a knock at the door and the packaged had been delivered.
| 3 Day = 1 Day of activity? |
When I checked, the tracking information was available, but apparently, it was all done when the package arrived at the local post office. No scans had been done prior to its arrival.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








